Thursday, March 8, 2012

MARCH MADNESS TURNS INTO NCAA INSANITY

This is an exciting time for Men's College Basketball.  And well it should be.  No matter what name you want to put to what we're about to experience again, "The Big Dance, The Final Four or March Madness",  the fanatics will be coming out of the wood unlike any other sport in the United States.  Not the Super Bowl, the World Series, the NBA Finals or the Stanley Cup can compare.  And it's not just the games themselves that cause the hysteria.

Some would say there's a formula to the lunacy.  Millions watch CBS Selection Sunday. ..... follow that with hours of "Bracketology" where the "analysts" dissect each game.....and then it's time for making an "educated" guess for an individual bracket which gets dropped into a contest, company "pool" or family challenge.  If anything has been proven over the years, it's that there is NO recipe for success.  Some entrants choose the winners by mascots, some flip a coin, others fall in love with school colors or there is the method of going strictly by the higher seeded team and God knows what else.  No matter the philosophy used, each thinks their bracket is the winner.  Is that delusional or what?

Will Kentucky Reach the Top Again?

For the NCAA, there is a method for this madness.  The basketball tournament funds up to 96 percent of their annual budget.  It has become a cultural, financial success that has generated huge television ratings.   Last year offered something new for the viewer.  "All the games all the time" was a ratings success the first weekend of March Madness.  Instead of just some of the games on CBS, every NCAA tournament game -- First Four, second and third rounds -- was on CBS, TBS, TNT or TRU-TV.  The first round games averaged 8.4 million viewers, a 14% increase over last year.

When news broke last year that an autistic teen named Alex Hermann had picked every game correctly through the first two rounds of the NCAA men's basketball tournament, reports focused on the unlikelihood of the event. After all, the odds of maintaining a  perfect bracket through two rounds—if you choose the top seeds in every game—are a mere 1 in 13,460,000. (Alex's unlikely feat appears to be unverifiable, because the website he used allowed changes after the fact, but for our purposes we'll assume it happened as reported.)

What people often lose sight of amid the excitement and human interest of stories like this is the fact that extremely unlikely things happen every day.  People win the lottery, even though the odds a Mega Millions entry will win the jackpot are just 1 in 175,700,000 and the odds for a Powerball entry are 1 in 195,200,000. Those odds are an order of magnitude less likely than Alex's March Madness picks (assuming, for the sake of argument, he chose the top seeds).

Okay, back to the fun. How good of an evaluator of match-ups are you?  Are you lucky? Or do you "wing it" with your predictions?  And.....what's at stake in the pool you're in?  Bragging rights, money, a trip or maybe some type of trophy.

Eight years ago, I put together a NCAA Bracket Challenge for our family.  The winner each year of the the pool is awarded the Kelling Family NCAA Traveling Trophy (two-foot high trophy with a basketball in a globe).  For some 350 plus days, the champion gets to maintain his superiority over the rest of the contestants.  Some winners have taken the trophy to work as a conversation piece, another put it on a mantle in the living room and others have put it away for safekeeping.....hoping "additional" care will enable them to defend their title.  It's been a whole lot of fun even though it took me six years to win the darn thing.  My youngest son won twice and my mother and sister hoisted the trophy once before I did.  Think it wasn't a relief when I finally won?

Who's the favorite this year?  Most would say Kentucky.... a team on a mission to win its eighth National Championship.  But there's also Syracuse, Duke, North Carolina, Kansas or a team I like watching, Missouri.  Could Murray State be this year's Cinderella ala Butler or VCU?  Time will tell. 

This weekend we turn back our clocks with Daylight Savings and it's Selection Sunday.  What a couple of great ways to help us acknowledge that spring is here and NCAA insanity is about to begin. 

Good luck with your bracket/brackets and keep reading,

John   

Friday, March 2, 2012

50 YEARS AGO...A SPORTS NIGHT UNEQUALED

March 2nd, 1962.  A day many of you weren't around for let alone remember.  For sports fans, it was a night unlike any other courtesy of the man they called "Wilt the Stilt".  ESPN's Donald Hunt wrote a fantastic story concerning Chamberlain's heroics.   His article, in its entirety is below.  It is a read unlike any other sports story I can recall.  Its lengthy for sure, but take a moment to relive something we WILL NEVER see again. 

The Greatest and the Stilt
"When you think about some of the most amazing individual accomplishments in sports, very few, if any, are more remarkable than Wilt Chamberlain's NBA-record 100-point game. Chamberlain put on a performance that more than likely will never be eclipsed by any NBA player.

The 7-foot-1, 275-pound center scored 100 points in leading the Philadelphia Warriors to a 169-147 victory over the New York Knicks on March 2, 1962, at the Hershey Sports Arena in Hershey, Pa. The "Big Dipper" shot 36-for-63 from the field and an incredible 28-for-32 from the free throw line. That was really something because Chamberlain was only a career 51.1 percent from the foul line. He played all 48 minutes.
That amazing game was 50 years ago. Kobe Bryant, the Los Angeles Lakers All-Star guard, is the only player to get within hailing distance of Chamberlain's mark. Bryant scored 81 points against the Toronto Raptors in 2006. He was still 19 points from the century mark, and that's with the 3-point shot.

Al Attles, former coach and general manager of the Golden State Warriors, played in that game. Attles, a 6-foot-4 guard, played in the Warriors' backcourt with Guy Rodgers, who was one of the NBA's most outstanding playmakers. Attles shot 8-for-8 from the field and 1-for-1 from the free throw line. He didn't miss a shot. Rodgers handed out 20 assists that night.

"I did all right, but Wilt had the big game," Attles said. "He was really dominant. Wilt had a tremendous game. It's been 50 years since that happened. It's the 50th anniversary of that game. It's truly stood the test of time. The thing I remembered about the game is Wilt didn't want to score 100. He wanted to come out of the game. Frank [McGuire, the Warriors' coach] kept him in the game. Wilt was very careful. He didn't want to rub it in. He was very conscious of that. We had some good players on both teams. Guy was a fantastic player. But Wilt was really special that game."

The Knicks did everything they could to try to slow Chamberlain down. Darrall Imhoff was the center for New York. Although Imhoff guarded Chamberlain around the basket, he had plenty of help from his teammates such as Richie Guerin, Willie Naulls and Cleveland Buckner. They all had big games. Guerin had a team-high 39 points. Buckner and Naulls scored 33 and 31, respectively. In a normal game, this would have been enough for the Knicks to defeat the Warriors, but Chamberlain's power dunks and finger rolls were just too much.

Chamberlain scored 23 points in the first quarter. He had 41 points at the half. He scored 28 points in the third quarter. And he tallied 31 in the fourth quarter, connecting on 12 of 21 shots from the field and seven of 10 shots from the free throw line.
Although Rodgers had 20 assists that game, it was Joe Ruklick, former Northwestern star, who made the pass to Chamberlain to score his 100th point. Ruklick, a reserve guard for the Warriors, carved out a spot in NBA history for himself.

"After I made the pass to Wilt for his 100th point, I went over to the scorer's table," Ruklick said. "I told the official scorer to give me the assist. I wanted that. I don't remember the year, but I said to Wilt, 'What was I doing in the game when you were trying to score 100?' It was before the basket. Wilt said, 'I told Frank to put you in the game.'

"Wilt and I were friends. He gave my son the jersey he wore in his first college game. I'm the only opposing player he invited to Kansas when they retired his jersey number."
The game didn't mean much in the standings. It wasn't a playoff or championship game. The attendance was just 4,124. Bill Campbell, a longtime Philadelphia sports radio announcer, called the game on the old WCAU radio station. Campbell is sorry he didn't make a copy of that historic broadcast of Chamberlain's legendary game.

"The thing that really stuck out in my mind is that I failed to tape it," Campbell said. "That was a dumb error on my part. I got so consumed with trying to keep track of the points and making sure I did it correctly. I thought about it when I was driving home that night. I wasn't a rookie in this business at that time. I had been around for awhile.
"Wilt called me from Los Angeles after he was elected to the Hall of Fame. He asked me if I had a tape of the fourth quarter. I said some of the fourth quarter. He said, 'Send it to the Hall of Fame.' As a matter of fact, the next morning in the office, I got a call from a fan.

"[The fan] said to me, 'I'm sure you have a tape of the game.' I pretended that I did. I couldn't bring myself to tell him that I didn't. He said, 'On my homemade recorder here at home, I managed to tape a little bit of it. I have a couple minutes of the fourth quarter, including the period when he got his 100th point.' He said, 'If you would [like] to have it, I can send it to [you].' He did send it, as I told Wilt this is the only thing we have pertaining to the 100-point game."

There is a book on the game. Gary Pomerantz is the author of "Wilt, 1962: The Night of 100 Points and the Dawn of a New Era," which provides a great deal of insight into the night when Chamberlain turned in his amazing performance.

"It's really something when you think about it," Pomerantz said. "There's no television coverage of the game. There are only a few photos. Wilt had this sensational game that only a few people saw that night. When Kobe scored 81 points, there was television coverage of that game. You can get a DVD of his game.

"Wilt's 100-point game really helped the NBA. He was such a gifted athlete. After he scored 100 points, people around the league wanted to come out and see this guy play the game."

Chamberlain has a special place in history. The Philadelphia 76ers clearly understand that. They have obtained the original court on which Chamberlain scored his 100 points. The historic court was purchased from Hershey Entertainment and Resorts, which had stored the court previously throughout the years.

A majority of the court will be preserved for posterity, and will be used and displayed at several venues. These include the Wells Fargo Center where the 76ers play and the team's practice facility in Philly as well as in Hershey. Also, the Sixers will donate some of the court to the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame in Springfield, Mass.
Harvey Pollack, who is now director of statistical information for the Philadelphia 76ers, covered the game for the Philadelphia Inquirer, The Associated Press and United Press International. He was also the Warriors' public relations director. But more than writing a game story, Pollack is known for one of the most popular photos in sports history. He was responsible for writing the number "100" on a plain white sheet of paper and handing it to Chamberlain; the photo was taken by Associated Press photographer Paul Vathis and is now a classic. Pollack, 89, has been involved with the NBA since it started in 1946. He has vivid memories of Chamberlain's unforgettable performance.
"The Philadelphia Inquirer decided not to send their beat writer to cover the game," said Pollack, a Hall of Famer. "They asked me to cover it for them. I brought my portable typewriter. Meanwhile, Associated Press and United Press International had staff members in Harrisburg, but they didn't know much about basketball.

"I'm actually the one who let the whole world know about this game. It's the biggest night I've ever had in all my 65 years in the league. I had to send a one-paragraph lead along with my game story. The Inquirer wanted to know every kind of shot that Wilt made.

"After the game, I checked everything out with Dave Richter, who was the official scorer. Once I got finished with Richter, I went to the locker room. We had one photographer [Vathis] at the game who worked for AP; he came there with his son. He saw by halftime that Wilt was going to do some fabulous feat. So, he went to the car and got his camera.

"I asked him, 'Did he get a shot of Wilt?' Then I said, 'Did something happen here tonight that was unusual?' He said, 'Yeah, Wilt scored 100 points.' I said, 'Let's do something to indicate that.' I grabbed an 8½-by-11 page out of the notebook. I wrote 100 on it. I said to the guy, 'Get the ball.' He asked me if Wilt would do it. I told him Wilt would do anything for me."

Pollack chronicled Chamberlain's NBA career. He knew Chamberlain as well as anybody who ever covered him in the NBA.

The 1961-62 season might have been Chamberlain's greatest individual year. He averaged 50.4 points a game. He scored an incredible 4,029 points while averaging 48.5 minutes a game. During that season, Chamberlain had games in which he scored 78, 73, 67 and 65 points.

As a prep star at Philadelphia's Overbrook High School, he scored 90 points in a Public League basketball game in 1955. In his first varsity game as a sophomore at Kansas, he scored 52 points against Northwestern. Chamberlain, who died in 1999, played in the NBA from 1959 to 1973. He played for the Philadelphia Warriors (which later became the San Francisco Warriors), the Philadelphia 76ers and the Los Angeles Lakers. He led the 1966-67 76ers to an NBA championship. Chamberlain also guided the 1971-72 Lakers to a league title. He has the second-highest scoring average (30.1 points per game) in NBA history, second to Michael Jordan by fractions of a point. Chamberlain was a four-time MVP.

"Wilt is by far the greatest player of them all," Pollack said. "When Wilt retired in 1973, the NBA record book for that year listed 128 records that he held. As of last year, 98 of those records still stood, and that's 39 years after he had retired."

And one of them is his 100-point game.

I hope you enjoyed the trip down memory lane and our special thanks to Donald Hunt.  Awesome man.  Wilt would have been proud of this tribute.  You captured it all.

Thanks for reading,

John

Friday, February 10, 2012

A NEW SPORTS RESOLUTION: "GET A LIFE"

So this is what it's coming to.  Win and you're the toast of the town, lose and.... 
Fans call out players and then coaches. Somebody has to go, somebody has to be responsible.  Yee-gad.  We just witnessed one of the more entertaining Super Bowls ever and in the next few days, take a look what's moving on twitter.

"Tom Brady is a CLOWN," tweeted Andrew Lucid (@TheFriarMan). "Selfish, choke artist, arrogant."


"Can't catch that lollipop? go focus on [your] mustache," Sean Hayden (@Irishsph) tweeted of Welker.


"Fire Belichick, trade Brady, kill Welker. I'm out," sent @VinnyDamato.
Charming.



Were these three men not sorrowful enough?  Didn't they hear about Brady sitting with a towel over his head for 18 minutes afterward, inconsolable?  Didn't they hear Welker fighting back tears as he said, "It comes to the biggest moment of my life, and I don't come up with it"?  Didn't they see Belichick standing on the podium looking as if somebody had just stabbed him in the big toe?  -from Rick Reilly, ESPN

Apparently there are some fans that felt let-down.  Hmmmmm.  If I'm not mistaken, the Patriots played in their fifth Super Bowl under the Belichick-Brady tandem.  In those five title games, they've won three and suffered two last minute defeats.  Not bad for a team that needs to make immediate overhaul, right?   

At last glance, there are four teams that have never played in the Super Bowl.  How'd you like to be fan of the Cleveland Browns, Detroit Lions, Jacksonville Jaguars or Houston Texans...then maybe, there would be a reason to complain. 

Bottom-line, the "sporting life" is getting far, far to scary.  Social media has taken us to an all-time low as far as fandom.  In the good old days, things were much different. Let's relive a few poignant times in our sports history:
 
"Remember 20 years ago, when Duke stunned Kentucky in arguably the greatest game in college basketball history on Christian Laettner's 17-footer at the buzzer?  According to "The Last Great Game" by Gene Wojciechowski, thousands of people cheered those Wildcats upon their arrival in Lexington.


Jack Nicklaus won 18 majors.  But he finished second 19 times. Did anybody call him "the former Golden Bear"?


What happened to grace?  To "it's just a game"?  To "thanks for a great season"?  Fans are lashing out at their team with the kind of vitriol reserved for Court TV villains".

And if he had dropped this, then what?

ESPN Writer Rick Reilly wrote a great piece on this subject, which I've taken a few lines from.  Here is his capper on the article. 

"As the NFL gets more and more behemoth, the more of this kind of Super Overreaction I see. The more of this two-faced loyalty.  The more of this I'll-never-get-over-this or I'll-never-forget-this reaction.  When San Francisco punt returner Kyle Williams muffed two punts leading to the 49ers' loss to the Giants in the NFC title game this season, he got numerous death threats.  Sick.


The players see all this and put up even bigger walls between themselves and the fans. Can you blame them? Who wants to pet a dog that might bite three seconds later"?

I can remember as a little guy, that each win and loss was the focal point of my day.  I had my game face on and you could tell how my favorite team had done by the demeanor I carried.  The end result ruled my emotions and how I treated others.  I'm not sure when, but some time over the years, I mellowed.  The losses weren't nearly as debilitating when I let them roll off my back.  The wins?  Of course they were satisfying...but not my end-all. 

So next time you get your shorts in a bundle.....slow down and take a deep breath.  And get a life.  After all, it's only a game.

Thanks for reading,

John


 

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

ALL-STAR GAMES?? ALL-STAR GAMES??

There were two games of supposed note this past weekend involving professional athletes, the NFL Pro Bowl and the NHL All-Star contest.  The key word is "supposed". 

I tuned in Sunday afternoon to watch the NHL stars, but I have to say, it looked more like a pee-wee scrimmage.  Maybe its been a long time since I've watched one of these, but I was shocked.  No checking,  no pushing, just a lot of passing and shooting and an occasional stop by a goalie.  What a disappointment.  The night before, I viewed some of the NHL skills competition and there was some really interesting moments....but this, ye GAD.  If I had thrown some money at a ticket for that, I'd be screaming for it back.  Heck, they'd be better off having every forward and defenseman take three shots at a goalie....most goals by a team is the winner in a shoot out and forget about the game.  That was just pathetic.  Just sayin.....

As disappointed as I was in the NHL contest, little did I know what I had in the offing for that evening with the Pro Bowl.  Before I say anything, let's have Aaron Rodgers say a few words.

"Criticism of the play in Sunday's Pro Bowl reached a new level when Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers blasted the effort of some NFC teammates Tuesday.

"I'll be honest with you," Rodgers said on ESPN 540 in Milwaukee. "I was a little bit disappointed.  I felt like some of the guys on the NFC side embarrassed themselves."
The AFC routed the NFC, 59-41, in a game that drew boos at Aloha Stadium for its lack of early intensity.  Rodgers, who started and played the first quarter for the NFC, didn't name specific players.

Let's be Honest......
I was just surprised that some of the guys either didn't want to play or when they were in there didn't put any effort into it," Rodgers said.  Avoiding injuries in a meaningless All-Star Game is a high priority for many players.  Rodgers, however, said that playing half-speed isn't the answer.

"I've always found that when you're going that tempo, that's when the injuries are going to happen, not if you're going full speed," Rodgers told ESPN 540. "You're more likely to get an injury standing around a pile or just going through it half speed."

I'm not sure why Rodgers stopped short of calling the game a disgrace for both the AFC and NFC.  It would have been better served to play flag football or leave virtually all lineman at home and play seven-on-seven.  Because that's pretty much what it amounted to.

We've got two more of these all-star games in the upcoming months.  First off, the NBA will showcase it's stars with the Ball Hog show.  Whoever shoots the most gets the MVP and all the attention.....and then this summer comes the MLB All-Star game.

If you're looking for some fire, some intensity and at least an effort that would cause someone to want to buy a ticket or watch, then watch baseball's version.  At least the winner of the game between the American and National League gets home field advantage in the World Series.  Which means the game means something.....rather than a vacation and a way to make some "chump" change.  Yowsa!!

Thanks for reading,

John     

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

MANY A SLEEPLESS NIGHT IN HAWKEYE NATION

February 1st won't come soon enough for Iowa Hawkeye football fanatics.   It's commonly referred to as National Signing Day, a day high school seniors can sign a letter-of-intent to play for the college team of their choice.  Considering the plethora of bad news out of Iowa City since late December, Iowa fans are needing a feel good closure.  A big one.

There has to be a whole lot of sleeplessness going on these days.  First, let's think of the recruits.  They're making perhaps the biggest choice of their life.  Everywhere they turn they are asked about their upcoming decision.  If it's not a friend, or coach or high school booster.....then it's Uncle Joey trying to help them with their choice.   In these last two weeks, most prospects have taken their official visits...so they've seen the landscape of the universities they're contemplating.  Now, it's the mad rush of the college coaches to their doorstep to talk to player and parents.  Each coach is selling ____ program as the best life-decision they could make.  And for some recruiters, it's a time to diss the schools recruits have in mind.  "You know Iowa's defensive coordinator retired and a young defensive coach left the program", a coach might infer.  "And they've had their top running back (Marcus Coker) and a top 2010 recruit (A.J. Derby) leave the program.  One thing we offer is stability.  You won't have to worry about things like that here at ______".   And don't think this language isn't being used in one form or another by rival coaching staffs.  It's a common part of the recruiting game these days.  Think of the sorted amount of pressure these young men are facing.  You can rest assured they see the face of each coach in their mind every night they put their head on the pillow.  For sure, they're not counting sheep.


Leaving the Program and Headed ??? 

Now, let's talk about the coaching staffs.  From now until January 29th, coaches will be on the run, literally.  One night they'll be in Aurora, Colorado and the next in Sioux City, Iowa.  It's the proverbial dash to the finish line.  Miles logged in the air and meals eaten on the run are common.  Each hour and each day has its importance.  If you think these times don't cause some tossing and turning, think again.  People's jobs depend on the ability to reel in a treasured recruit.  And to hold onto them.  For programs like Iowa, the development aspect of an athlete has become more important than the actual signing.  With the prospect of three running backs and a potential stud linebacker/defensive end leaving the program....it's caused the fan base to wonder about the future.  And for good reason.  It would appear there are a number of holes in the dike.  Fill one spot with a recruit and two more pop up with defections.  Hardly an equation for success.    Many consider this off-season crucial.  Crucial in making the right hire for a defensive coordinator to replace a legend in Norm Parker.  Critical in adding a defensive line coach that can breath fire back into a front four that has been average at best in the last two seasons.  And important to soothe the hearts and minds of a legion that clamors for double digit winning seasons and bowl trips of note.  Not back to back Insight Bowls.

So, let's talk about the fans of HawkeyeNation.   Are they a spoiled bunch?  Are they asking too much from a program that has endured 8-5 and 7-6 in the last two years, respectively.  The quick answers are yes and no.  Of course they're a spoiled lot.  And why wouldn't they be.  Success bred success in Iowa City.  It is what it is.  To expect anything less would be accepting complacency.  Head man Kirk Ferentz took over a program from Hayden Fry that was slowly losing its way.  Fans are not wanting a return to those days.  If you listen to the sports radio talk shows, fans are incensed with the Hawkeye hoopola.  Feverish in some households.  I'm sure there are a few that lie in bed and think of any number of scenarios regarding current or potential Hawks.  The time and energy they devote to their addiction more than likely promotes lack of sleep. 

The next two weeks will define the depth of a roster of future and present Hawkeyes.  It will indicate the boldness in a coach and a program in making two coach hires.  And lastly, it will have much to do with  injecting or depleting the enthusiasm of a fan base that is "tired" of a whole lot of goings on surrounding the program.  And that's Kirk Ferentz's job.  If you think he doesn't lie awake at night...think again. 

Thanks for reading,

John                

          

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

NO MORE PASSING GAS FOR IOWA'S FERENTZ

Iowa Football began in a quandary in 2011 when reports of rhabdomyolysis involving current players began circulating in the local media.  Questions began to mount and then reports went national....the scrutiny began.  Critics were quick to point out a slow response Iowa officials showed in their reaction process.  Probably a point well taken.  After many weeks of bad press clippings, the program was able to weather the storm.  Did it hurt recruiting?  Did other programs use that against Iowa...for sure.  Oh, life in a fish bowl.

When the season kicked off this past September there was glowing optimism.  In the season opener, true freshman running back Mika'il McCall helped fuel those thoughts when he ripped off 35 yards in 6 carries.  He looked to have tremendous promise.  On the sixth carry, McCall suffered a foot injury which later turned out to be a broken ankle.  Many fans were distraught.  McCall was first thought to be out for the season, however that was not the case.  After weeks of rehab he was able to return to practice.  When would McCall return to action?  That seemed to be a weekly media question to Ferentz....yet he continued to sit.  When he finally hit the playing field against Purdue he fumbled the ball on his second carry.  McCall was promptly benched.  The McCall response to "riding the pine" was to raise his middle finger in protest at Ferentz.  Soon thereafter, he hit Facebook with some candid remarks to show his disgust.  The outcome of his reaction was a suspension by the Hawkeye head man.  Weeks later, another off-field incident surfaced involving McCall which cemented any hope he had in returning to the team for the bowl trip to Arizona.  Ultimately McCall decided to transfer.  Bump#1

Bump #2 and #3.  Long-time Defensive Coordinator Norm Parker decides to retire on December 11th.  A fan favorite for many year's, Parker's health had become a concern.  Ultimately Norm decided to concentrate on his diabetes issues, thus opening the door for a replacement to the coaching staff.  The question now, does Ferentz stay in-house or go outside for the hire?  Many fans are hopeful of a new approach to the defense and want someone new.....others feel defensive back coach Phil Parker deserves a chance.  Ten days after Parker announced his retirement, came news of defensive line coach Rick Kaczenski departing the Hawkeyes for Husker Nation.  Losing a key coach to rival Nebraska was looked at as a unusual move.  More than anything, it brought up a myriad of questions.  Why was he leaving?  Was he being forced out?  Was there a rift between he and Ferentz?  How were potential recruits going to react to both Parker and Kaczenski leaving?  Ultimately, Kaczenski responded to his departure by saying the opportunity was just "to great" to turn down the Nebraska offer and was leaving on good terms. What's left unanswered is the recruit issue.   Ferentz doesn't seem concerned.

As of today, there has been little discussion of staff replacements for the two.  One name that surface last week was Penn State interim head coach Tom Bradley.  Known for his defensive prowess while serving under Joe Paterno...is he the man you want to try and sell to the masses?  Bradley might be a terrific coach, however with tenous times in Iowa City, I'm not sure he's the right hire.  Would it be too much to ask for Ferentz to hire someone with a Hawkeye background?  Regardless there are two openings on staff that need filling....the sooner the better.

BUMP #34. 1/11/2012.  Suspended running back Marcus Coker decides to leave the program and transfer to another school.  Who could have seen this coming?  Despite a clouded reason for Coker not making the trip to Arizona, most felt the Hawkeyes top rusher in 2011 would return.  Something or someone convinced him to leave.  While some will say, "next man in"...this line is gettng far too old.  For various reasons, the Hawkeyes have lost running backs Jewel Hampton, Brandon Wegher, McCall and Adam Robinson in the last few years.  And now Coker. 


Step on the Gas and do some "Explainin"

What's happening in Iowa City?  That's what alot of people would like to know.  2012 recruit Jaleel Johnson responded via Facebook, "Starting to have doubts about the future, what is going on in that place"?                

Johnson's words should be enough for Iowa officials to step up and do some explaining.  Ferentz was flippant in a remark about personnel matters as he came off the practice field while in Arizona.  "I passed gas out there about an hour into practice. Did you guys catch that on mic?  I'll see if I can muster one up for you right now." 

Now is not the time for funny.  I can think of 3.65 million reasons to talk.   A little "explainin" and truth will go a long way. 

Thanks for reading,

John

Thursday, January 5, 2012

CHICAGO SPORTS TEAMS LOSE SOME BAGGAGE

In the last two days, there has been a different air blowing in Chicago.  Maybe that's why they call it the Windy City.   First, on Tuesday, the Bears began the day by firing General Manager Jerry Angelo.  Hours later, Offensive Coordinator Mike Martz and Quarterbacks coach Shane Day were shown the door.  Head Coach Lovie Smith suggested Martz left due to philosophical differences.  Martz commented that "the time was right for him to move on".  Shane Day was likely dismissed because of his association with the stubborn Martz who was never able to duplicate the "Fastest Show on Turf" he enjoyed in St. Louis.

For many fans, the Angelo and Martz dismissals were a day of great rejoicing.  Despite guiding the Bears to four divisional titles during his time, Jerry was never embraced by the public or the media.  These past two years explemified  Angelo's general lack of preparation for the unknown.  All National Football League teams must have a back-up quarterback.  When injuries sidelined Jay Cutler, the less than household names of Todd Collins and Caleb Hanie came to the rescue.  Neither were the answer.  In fact, they were horrible.  Then let's throw in Angelo's less than stellar drafting ability.  Only three number one choices are on the current roster since 2000.  Brian Urlacher, Chris Williams and Gabe Carimi.  Only Urlacher was healthy the entire year.....and he had to be held together with bubble gum and baling wire.  It didn't help that in 2006, 2009 and 2010 the Bears were without their number one pick.  That's hardly a direction to success, especially when division rival, the Green Bat Packers, have shown the ability to not only draft, but develop homegrown talent.

Now that the shoe has dropped on Angelo and Martz, the big question that is beginning to surface is, in what way will Bear's brass fill their positions.  There seems to be a mind-set the Bears will go cheap and could go in-house to replace Angelo.  Former Seahawk General Manager Tim Ruskell is on staff, he could get a look-see especially if Lovie Smith gets to weigh in on the decision.  If......and I say that will great apprehension, IF the Bears are truly committed to changing the landscape in Chicago, they will go outside the organization and hire someone with a track record of success.  And at this time there is only one person that fills that distinction, Bill Poilan.  However, given the age of the former Indianapolis head man,  it might be smarter to look at someone who has directed player personnel decisions and is young, creative and above all, able to stand up the test of the Chicago Bears fans and media.  Who could that be?  Try Baltimore Raven's Director of Player Personnel, Eric DeCosta.  He's 40.....has been interviewed and sought after by more than one organization in recent years. He's a hot item and he's your man. (Update 1/6.  DeCosta stays with Ravens)

With DeCosta in hand, you let him and Lovie come to an understanding as to who the replacement for Offensive Coordinator will be and that results will be expected.  Immediately.  (Update 1/6 Bears Line Coach Mike Tice accepts OC job)  And if they don't succeed, then Smith should be shown the door.  Is that a recipe for failure?  I think not.  The NFL has no time for middle of the roaders.  Either you succeed or you don't.  With one year observation, DeCosta will know if Luvable Lovie is his man.

On the North Side...Cubs fans were flabbergasted Wednesday when G.M. Theo Epstein sent Carlos Zambrano packing to the Miami Marlins.  Good riddance.  As I mentioned in an earlier post, by dumping overpaid and combustible players, Epstein could be thought of as Theo Einstein and not Epstein.  With this money dump of some $15 million, Epstein rids the ballclub of a big cancer.  The new general manager wants a change of attitude in Chicago.  This move signals a distinct move in that direction.

Are the Chicago winds still blowing?

Do these moves by the Bears and Cubs suggest to another team, for instance, the White Sox, that it's time to make some bold moves?  Outfielder Alex Rios has two years left on a contract that looks almost as ugly as Alphonso Soriano.  The only problem is, he doesn't produce anywhere near Soriano's numbers.  Then there is pitcher Jake Peavy and DH Adam Dunn.  Both suffered through the 2010 campaign, Peavy with injuries and Dunn experienced issues switching leagues.  Both have proven over the years to be capable professionals and have earned the opportunity to right their careers.  If they don't by mid-season, then they should be moved.  Then there's GM Kenny Williams.  The production of the three for mentioned is and should be tied to William's future.  Because of they don't come through, another big wind needs to wisk through the Chicago area and continue the seasons of change.  Wouldn't that be refreshing?        

Thanks for reading,

John